Malpractice Misdiagnosis
Brien Roche

Malpractice Misdiagnosis Presents Issues as To Cause

A doctor’s misdiagnosis may result in injury to a patient. A patient must have a 50% or better chance of survival or recovery in order to prove causation based upon such a failure. Under the loss-of-chance doctrine, if the patient in fact had less than an even chance of survival or recovery then the doctor may be liable for the reduction in that chance. This theory is set forth in a legal treatise known as the Restatement of Torts. This states that if the doctor’s failure increases the risk of harm then she may be liable to the extent of that increase.

Not all states recognize the loss-of-chance doctrine. It is a legal doctrine with authority behind it. It can be pursued in the right case.

The evidence necessary to prove this form of causation is frequently difficult to elicit. Many doctors are not willing to express opinions on issues that some might deem to be guesswork.

Failure To Diagnose-Cardiac Problems

A frequent area of malpractice misdiagnosis is in the cardiac field. Coronary artery disease is frequently thought of as limited to men. However, it is a disease that affects many women. It is important to know the signs and symptoms that a male presents when having a heart attack. They may be different with a female. The classic male case includes severe, burning pain, pain radiating down the left arm, a crushing type of pain in the chest area. However, women may initially present with symptoms of transient chest pain, upper abdominal pain, back pain, intense nausea, sweating, and shortness of breath.

Common Risk Factors In Cardiac Misdiagnosis Malpractice

The common risk factors for coronary artery disease are age, a history of smoking, and high blood pressure. In addition serum cholesterol, low HDL cholesterol, diabetes, obesity, and a family history of heart disease. Although these factors may be the same for both men and women, the risk increases dramatically with women who have diabetes. There are a variety of tests that can and should be employed for diagnosing coronary artery disease. Likewise for determining whether the patient has had a heart attack:

  • A blood test to measure elevated cardiac enzymes. If it is positive, that means that a heart attack has occurred. A negative test, however, does not mean that a heart attack has not occurred or is not occurring.
  • An electrocardiogram (EKG) is a snapshot of the heart’s electrical activity. It can reveal injury or problems.
  • An echocardiogram is a test that provides a picture of the heart based on sound waves. It will show malfunctions in the contractions of the heart’s chambers.
  • Cardiac catheterization is the best way to study arteries and diagnose coronary artery disease. This test is performed by inserting a catheter into the vessel. Dye is then injected into the arteries. It is traced by an X-ray showing whether any of the vessels are damaged or narrowed.

In looking at cases involving males versus females you need to recognize the difference in signs and symptoms.

For Malpractice Misdiagnosis Cases Contact a Medical Malpractice Attorney

If you have been injured as a result of malpractice misdiagnosis, contact us. Also for more info on medical malpractice see the other pages on this site. In addition, for more info about heart attacks see the pages on Wikipedia.

See proximate cause for a review of Virginia case law. For more info on proximate cause see the pages on Wikipedia.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Print
Picture of Brien Roche
Brien Roche

Brien A. Roche has been an attorney since 1976. Mr. Roche is admitted to practice in Virginia, the District of Columbia, and Maryland. In addition to his busy law practice, Mr. Roche is also a published author of several books & articles relating to the practice of law.

Learn More

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *