Ordinary Care Cases Summarized By Injury Lawyer

Fairfax Injury Lawyer Brien Roche Summarizes Ordinary Care Cases
Brien Roche

This page within Virginia Tort Case Law is a compilation of cases reported by the Virginia Supreme Court and summarized by Brien Roche dealing with the topic of Ordinary Care. For more information on ordinary care cases see the pages on Wikipedia 

Ordinary Care-Cases

1984 VanCollom v. Johnson, 228 Va. 103, 319 S.E.2d 745.

Plaintiff severely injured by grease fire in kitchen when she picked up burning pan and tried to throw it outside so as to prevent damage and injury to occupants of house. Court refused instruction on assumption of risk but did instruct jury that if it believed from evidence that actions taken by plaintiff were not reasonable under circumstances, then plaintiff cannot recover.Instruction based on concept of ordinary care.

1957 Collins v. Smith, 198 Va. 778, 96 S.E.2d 818.

Ordinary care means that reasonable care must be exercised. It does not mean that defendant is insurer of safety.

Free Phone Consultation

Request a Free Phone Consultation by filling out the form below. We'll be in touch shortly about your case.
Name(Required)
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Latest Reveiw

“I have been a client of Brien Roche for over 25 years and continue to receive exception service. Over the years he has represented in numerous situations including very large commercial transactions, business issues and others. His advice is invaluable as he listens well and is very measured in his responses. He will give you options and the pros and cons of each for you to decide what is your best course of action. I strongly encourage anyone to meet with Brien before they decide who to hire to represent them.” - Clifton Killmon
Top Attorney VA