Splitting Cause of Action Cases Summarized By Personal Injury Lawyer

Fairfax Injury Lawyer Brien Roche Addresses Splitting Cause Of Action Cases
Brien Roche

This page within Virginia Tort Case Law is a compilation of cases reported by the Virginia Supreme Court and summarized by Brien Roche dealing with the topic of Splitting Cause of Action.  

 

1955 Gary Steel Corp. v. Kitchin, 197 Va. 471, 90 S.E.2d 120.

Plaintiff did not split his cause of action by proceeding to collect for his immediate damages in first action and to collect for reimbursement damages by his second action, as action for reimbursement had not accrued until after first action had been tried to conclusion. If action is brought for part of cause of action, judgment obtained in that proceeding precludes plaintiff from recovering second judgment for residue of that cause of action.

1949 Carter v. Hinkle, 189 Va. 1, 52 S.E.2d 135.

Single tort resulting in damage to both person and property gives rise to distinct claims and recovery in one is no bar to recovery in other.

 

Free Phone Consultation

Request a Free Phone Consultation by filling out the form below. We'll be in touch shortly about your case.
Name(Required)
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Latest Reveiw

“I have been a client of Brien Roche for over 25 years and continue to receive exception service. Over the years he has represented in numerous situations including very large commercial transactions, business issues and others. His advice is invaluable as he listens well and is very measured in his responses. He will give you options and the pros and cons of each for you to decide what is your best course of action. I strongly encourage anyone to meet with Brien before they decide who to hire to represent them.” - Clifton Killmon
Top Attorney VA