This page within Virginia Tort Case Law is a compilation of cases reported by the Virginia Supreme Court and summarized by Brien Roche dealing with the topic of Warranties-Choice of Remedies.
1987 Cauthorn v. British Leyland, 233 Va. 202, 355 S.E.2d 306.
Concurring opinion states that products liability claim based on breach of warranty theory should be treated as tort action, not contract action.
1966 Holz v. Coates Motor Co., 206 Va. 894, 147 S.E.2d 152.
Where there is breach of warranty in sale of personalty, buyer has two remedies: (1) return goods and demand money back; and (2) seek pecuniary damages against seller.
For more information on warranties see the pages on Wikipedia.
